Moving to Doom Emacs!

.emacs.d/modules/lang/purescript/config.el

@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+;;; lang/purescript/config.el -*- lexical-binding: t; -*-
+
+(after! purescript-mode
+  (add-hook! 'purescript-mode-hook
+             #'purescript-indentation-mode
+             #'rainbow-delimiters-mode)
+  (set-lookup-handlers! 'purescript-mode
+    :definition #'psc-ide-goto-definition
+    :documentation #'purescript-pursuit))
+
+
+;; (use-package! flycheck-purescript
+;;   :after purescript-mode
+;;   :config
+;;   (add-hook 'flycheck-mode-hook #'flycheck-purescript-setup))
+
+
+(use-package! psc-ide
+  :hook (purescript-mode . psc-ide-mode)
+  :config
+  (remove-hook 'company-backends 'company-psc-ide-backend)
+  (set-company-backend! 'purescript-mode 'company-psc-ide-backend))

.emacs.d/modules/lang/purescript/packages.el

@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+;; -*- no-byte-compile: t; -*-
+;;; lang/purescript/packages.el
+
+;; As far as I can tell, at the moment, flycheck-purescript does not work well
+;; due to expecting the compiler to be psc rather than purs. However, one of
+;; purescript-mode or psc-ide seems to handle flycheck, so it might be
+;; unnecessary altogether.
+;;(package! flycheck-purescript)
+
+(package! psc-ide)
+(package! purescript-mode)
+